Process · RFP 2.2.2 contract management

How a task order runs, from request to accepted report

The same seven steps run for a single position audit and for a department study. Only the number of positions, interviews and comparators changes, and the dates scale with them. Every step has an owner and a date in the task order, which is how the City's milestone metric gets measured.

1. Request acknowledged

Within 2 business days (RFP 2.2.1 metric 1)
The engagement manager confirms receipt in writing

Jelani House replies to the City's contract administrator, names the analyst who will lead, and proposes a 30-minute scoping call within the week.

2. Scope and fixed price

Within 5 business days of the scoping call
A one-page task order proposal

Positions and classes in scope, comparators (City-named), data needed from the City, deliverables, milestone dates, and a fixed fee built from the contract rate card. Nothing starts until Human Resources approves it in writing (RFP 2.2.3: no payment without prior authorization).

Deliverable: signed task order with dates and a not-to-exceed amount

3. Kickoff and data intake

Week 1
Assignment kickoff with Human Resources and the department

Current specifications, organization charts, incumbent list, prior studies and any MOU language that drives the study. Questionnaires (PDQs) go out through Plumbline with a two-week window and completion tracking by unit.

4. Job analysis

Weeks 2 to 4 for a small study
PDQs, interviews and desk audits

Incumbent and supervisor interviews (virtual by default, on site when the work calls for it), essential functions documented, and each position compared with the current specification on duties, span of control, supervision received and minimum qualifications.

5. Internal equity and market

In parallel with step 4
Internal alignment first, then the comparators

Where the class sits against related classes and supervisors (compression, ladders, confidential and non-career variants), then base salary or total compensation against the City's comparators, every datapoint carrying its agency, document and effective date.

6. Draft to Human Resources

Review window agreed in the task order (usually 5 business days)
Findings, recommendations and draft specification revisions

Human Resources reviews before anyone else sees a recommendation. Questions are answered in writing and logged. Recommendations stay within the City's direction; implementation and bargaining remain the City's.

7. Final report and presentation

On the task order date (RFP 2.2.1 metric 3)
Report, data sheets and a presentation if the City asks for one

Method, sources, analysis and recommendations in Word; compensation data sheets in Excel with formulas intact; revised specifications in the City's format. Invoice by assignment name after acceptance.

Deliverable: accepted final report; working files transferred to the City

Standard sizes and turnaround

Turnaround runs from the date the City supplies complete data. Fixed fees for each size are in HSG's cost proposal.
StudyTypical scopeTurnaround
Position auditOne position, one reclassification request: PDQ, two interviews, allocation memo15 business days
Class specificationOne new or revised class, with internal salary placement15 business days
Class-family studyUp to 5 classes and 30 positions, with a light market check6 weeks
Base salary market study10 benchmark classes, up to 12 City-named comparators4 weeks
Total compensation studyOne bargaining unit, 25 benchmarks: base, health, retirement, special pays8 weeks
Department classification studyAbout 40 classes and 200 positions, with internal equity and compression14 weeks
Citywide studyScoped with the City as its own task orderper task order
Communication

What Human Resources gets, and when

  • One named contact for every assignment, reachable by email and phone.
  • A written status note every week on any open assignment: done, next, open issues, anything that threatens a date.
  • Issues that affect scope, schedule or deliverables raised within one business day, in writing (RFP 2.2.2).
  • Department contact only as Human Resources directs, with HR copied.
  • Live status in the Plumbline workspace for HR staff who want it.
Quality

Who checks what

  • Every classification determination signed by Gilda Weech-House, Certified Job Evaluator.
  • FLSA designations reviewed by Joel Sutherland against 29 CFR Part 541.
  • Every market figure traced to its source document and effective date before it leaves the firm.
  • A second analyst re-runs each calculation in a report; differences are logged and closed.
  • Jelani House reads every deliverable before it goes to the City.
Team

The people on every Long Beach assignment

  • Jelani House, engagement manager and single point of contact
  • Gilda Weech-House, MA, Lead Classification Analyst, Certified Job Evaluator
  • Raina Cook, MS, Compensation & Benchmarking Lead
  • Michael Nelson, MBA, Methodology Lead (PDQs, interviews, document control)
  • Joel V. Sutherland, MA, Classification & Compliance Analyst (FLSA)
  • Laverne Cunningham, Senior HR Subject-Matter Expert
Platform

Plumbline, shown on a demonstration town

Plumbline is HSG's classification and compensation platform: PDQs with completion tracking and supervisor walls, position analysis with the evaluator's determination on record, market datapoints with provenance, pay structure, equity and cost scenarios, and a status report Human Resources can export. A fictional demonstration town, Riverbend, runs on the live platform at riverbend.plumbline-hr.com for guided walkthroughs. No City workspace is created and no City data is loaded before an award.

What we ask of the City on each assignment

Current specifications and organization charts; an incumbent list with class, unit and hire date; any prior study on the same classes; the comparator list; a Human Resources reviewer for drafts; and help from department heads to get PDQs completed on work time. Small studies need little more than the PDQ and two interviews.